Catcher

I was really interested by the comment made in class last week that several people enjoyed Catcher in the Rye far less than after reading the novel a second time. I had a similar experience but not quite to the same extent. I still enjoyed it a lot a lot but maybe not as much as my first read.

I think the book is popular with the younger readers for several reasons (and perhaps these reasons fade with age). Holden is a rebel. I think he relates to every kid in America who has ever dreamed of rebelling in any way—merely by leaving school early, ruthlessly pointing out phonies, and running around New York City. Sure, he is from an extremely privileged background but he still faces and embodies many of the social situations that cross class lines. His rebellious quality, while I still love it and find it hilarious, may not carry as much weight with older readers.

His sheer desperation also must resonate with younger readers. We talked about the awkward times of middle and high school last week. It is nice to read a work of literature that so accurately describes the toils of adolescence. What’s more, Holden continually struggles with the death of Ali so Salinger is able to balance more serious problems with phonies, awkward sexual encounters and dates, and all the phonies. Through Holden’s rambly narrative, Salinger is able to touch on so many issues that are relevant to teenagers while simultaneously packing it with some humor. Again, adults far removed from these issues may not enjoy the novel as much.

I have thoroughly enjoyed rereading Catcher this past week.